Representative Erickson takes on state government fee increases

It's no secret that the answer to tough budget times is often found in practicing the not-so-fine art of "revenue enhancement". For small towns, the solution can mean making the cops write a flurry of traffic tickets, but for others, the gap is often closed by seeking to raise fees for everything a governmental agency does.

Representative Shannon Erickson thinks that practice is just plain wrong, and so do we. Her concerns were voiced via one of her grassroots constituent emails which she sent earlier this week:


Last week, the State Fire Marshal’s office submitted new regs with added fees & when Philip Lowe & I asked them to reconsider that, they immediately withdrew the fee increases. Very graciously, I might add!

Unfortunately, DHEC has several reg bills coming before committees that have fee/fine increases in them. Even with opposition voiced by businesses it affects, the agency has decided to move forward on the increases.

This just another way to tax the business sector of our state. You can call it what you want, but right now the business community simply cannot afford ANY raise in fees/taxes/etc.


One of the reasons we're impressed with Erickson is because she doesn't just gripe about problems - she takes action. She's sponsored legislation (House Bill 3576) which would require that:


... no state agency, department, or entity by regulation or otherwise may administratively increase or implement a fee for performing a service or function, or a civil penalty or fine for failure to comply with a requirement or provision of law under its jurisdiction without the specific approval of the increased or new fee, fine, or penalty by the General Assembly by concurrent resolution.


The Blogland is glad to endorse Erickson's legislation, and are pleased at the bi-partisan team of legislatiors who've already signed on to support this measure:

Brantley, Ballentine, Huggins, Bowen, Duncan, Vick, Chalk, Bedingfield, Nanney, Merrill, Haley, Toole, Allison, Anthony, Bannister, Bingham, Forrester, Hamilton, Hardwick, Hearn, Herbkersman, Horne, Limehouse, Long, Millwood, Owens, Parker, Parks, E.H. Pitts, M.A. Pitts, Rice, Sandifer, G.R. Smith, Sottile, Spires, Stringer, Umphlett, Viers, White, Whitmire, Wylie and A.D. Young.

Legislators who are concerned about the impact of the cost of government upon individuals and businesses in these tough times need to get behind this bill and get it passed into law.

3 Response to "Representative Erickson takes on state government fee increases"

  1. Anonymous 20/2/09 12:31
    And we're supposed to be for this just because you said so? Talk about a dumb move.
  2. Anonymous 20/2/09 13:10
    It seems that some people want to exchange spelling of certain words in the dictionary: ie: FEE vice TAXES. Either way it is TAX!!!
  3. Anonymous 20/2/09 14:58
    I'd agree!

Post a Comment

Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts!

To post a comment without having a Blogger account, select "Name/URL", put your name in, but leave the URL line blank. Email me if you'd like to comment, but need help making it work.